The Supreme Court illuminate the plans of Trump for collective launch in federal agencies

On Tuesday, the Supreme Court canceled the minimum stand for President Trump to reduce the size of the federal government through Group fire In various agencies.

The non -signed order from the Trump Administration’s Supreme Court allows the president to implement February 13. Executive order Requesting “widespread discounts” across the government.

Judgment – the latest in a series of Trump’s victories in supreme court He was supported by liberal justice, Sonia Sotomoor, and overcomes the judge of North California Province, Susan Eleneston, on May 9, the administration plans to demobilize workers and close programs are freezed.

“Because the government is likely to succeed in its argument that the executive order and the memo are legal – and because other factors bearing whether the residency will be given satisfaction – we are granted the request,” and mentioned the Supreme Court order.

The court indicated that “we do not express the absence of an opinion on the legitimacy of any agency (a reduction in force) and the reorganization plan that was produced or approved according to the executive order and the memo.”

The Supreme Court decided that Illston, appointed to former President Bill Clinton, prevented Trump’s order based on “her point of view on legitimacy” and “not on any evaluation of the plans themselves” – which the judges note “not before this court.”

In the opposition, Judge Kitanji Brown Jackson accused “of temporary and practical preservation that reduces the damage to the current situation was not identical to the enthusiasm of this court for the green in the procedures of this suspicious president in the emergency situation.”

She warned: “This executive procedure is considered by the end of the mass employees, the abolition of federal programs and services on a large scale, and the dismantling of many federal government as established by Congress.”

“Under our constitution, Congress has the authority to establish administrative agencies and the details of their functions,” Jackson wrote, on the pretext that Trump should have first obtained permission from Congress before trying to reorganize federal agencies.

Meanwhile, Sotomoor noted that she agreed with Jackson that Trump “could not restructure federal agencies in a way that does not correspond to the states of Congress”, but indicated a very early date to determine whether the administration is planning to reduce the size of the federal workforce illegally.

“The plans themselves are not in front of this court, at this stage, and therefore we have no opportunity to consider whether it is possible and will be implemented in accordance with the restrictions of the law.” “Join the court’s residence because it leaves the provincial court free to consider these questions in the first place.”

He supervised the efforts of the Trump administration to reduce the size of the federal workforce before Ministry of Governmental efficiency (Doge)Led by billionaire Elon Musk previously.

Workers and non -profit groups filed a lawsuit against collective workers from occurrence, which would affect federal workers in the departments of agriculture, energy, work, interior, state, and the cabinet of ancient warriors, as well as the National Science Foundation, the Small Business Association, Social Security Administration, and the Environmental Protection Agency.

Today, the Supreme Court has suspended the minimum courts that do not work the law from restricting President Trump’s authority over federal employees – another victory in the Supreme Court thanks to the lawyers (Ministry of Justice), “Public Prosecutor Pam Bondi Books on xA reaction to the matter.

“Now, federal agencies can become more efficient than ever,” she added.