How did the “Starmer Rebel” coalition assume the well -being – and won

Sir Kerr Starmer requesting the cabinet on Tuesday to look back with “a feeling of pride and achievement” in the first year of the Labor Party – but through the road in the House of Commons, his party stumbled on chaos and employment.

It plans to reduce 5 billion pounds from the bill for the escalating benefits in Britain in a state of rebellion for a week, and reached its peak in a At the last minute climbing By Starmer, which was separated from the heart, which was supposed to be the pioneering project of welfare.

“People must understand that it was a sincere mistake, it was not harmful,” said a minister in the cabinet minutes before the vote. A draft law aims to save 5 billion pounds, may already end at the cost of money.

Although the budget of the welfare law, which was reduced, approved its second decisive reading on Tuesday, the damage to the reputation of the Prime Minister, its main lieutenant, the party unity and the public financial resources is great.

After a non -organized decline in the past week failed to avoid the risk of the potential defeat of the House of Commons, Starmer was forced to walk to his deputies. “Literally, what is the goal now?” One of the workers’ deputy asked, looking at the remains of the bill. “Everything has been destroyed.”

Kimi Badnouch, the conservative leader, described it as “surrender” and it was difficult to find an incompatible deputy. The blame game was already in full swing, as Chancellor Rachel Reeves attracts many of them.

Reeves was the one who insisted on luxury savings of 5 billion pounds to correct public financial resources, and was blamed by the Labor Party representatives for their attempt to lead through the reforms that have always been a difficult political sale.

While there is an intersecting consensus on the need to curb the growing luxury bill, the idea of ​​paying the discounts equivalent to 5,000 pounds of 1 million patients or disabled people is always likely to create widespread anger at the level of herbal anxiety.

Some pointed fingers in the government whip – parliamentarians who make sure of the members of Parliament in the feet line – for their failure to discover a rebellion that grew to 126 deputies last week.

But Starmer, who attended another external summit last week in the Netherlands, was accused by many of his deputies of managing operation No. 10, which is seriously separated from its parliamentary party and local concerns.

One of the Labor Party deputy said: “It was not the mistake of the whip.” “Downing Street was warned, but they did not listen.”

Morgan Maksini, Chief of Staff Staff, worked closely with Reeves in an attempt to initially with the original repairs. “They were heavy.”

The individual of the Labor Party close to the discussions said that the leadership of the Upper Party believes that the cuts in social welfare will be common among workers, even if they are not palatable to many deputies.

They said, “It is not like the problem of paying fuel in the winter,” referring to the spin earlier in Reeves, which agreed to reduce public anger by restoring benefit to millions of retired. “The audience really cares about it.”

YouGov poll found in March that 68 percent of the British believe that the benefits system needs reform, compared to 18 percent who said he did not. About 53 percent believed that the criteria for receiving advantages were not strict enough, compared to the 25 percent of those who opposed.

But the public was more supportive of the benefits for the disabled and the basis Labor deputies are offered. The possibility of confronting the rebellion by more than 100 deputies puts alarm bells last week, and concessions began.

He was the largest former Tarmer rebellion, 16 deputies voting for planning reforms, according to Kauli’s elephant, professor of Queen Mary, London.

A deal was cooked last Thursday to soften the package of discounts on personal independence payments and the health component of global credit – which reduces potential savings by 2.5 billion pounds – including ensuring that the current demands are not affected by the new CDs.

Ashraf Maxoini, head of the Labor Party, Sir Alan Campbell, and Prime Minister Angela Rainer, Ashraf Ashrafini, Ashraf, Ashraf, Ashraf, who has fulfilled some of the work deputies, but left a lot wanting more.

The members of Parliament in the Labor Party, Dam MiG Hiller, Helen Hays, and Deby Abrahams, were in talks on the “rebel” side, although one of the loyal workers usually hated this phrase. “The fact that I am supposed to be part of a” rebel alliance “showing how wrong the government is.”

Liz Kendall, Minister of Labor and Pensions, has increasingly cut an increasing personality because she tried to sell repairs. “She looks as if she was tortured,” said Padnosh on the House of Commons on Tuesday.

But the representatives of the Labor Party realized that Reeves was leading politics. “The message was confused.” “It seemed as if it had been done for financial reasons, rather than reforming a broken system that benefits from the benefits.”

One of the work officials added that Reeves was getting “most of the stick” from colleagues, claiming that the ministers in the Kendall department were separately that the cuts forced them to them by the treasury.

Badnoush claimed that the Welfare Bill had “rushed to Rachel” and admitted the chief governmental informed that the chancellor insisted on a luxury package prepared in a hurry to support her financial platform in the spring statement in March.

Until Tuesday night, calls of the counselor dismissed were kept hidden. But after the disaster scale there were signs that could change. “Rachel should be elites after this,” said one of the Labor Party deputy.

Starmer, according to the Prime Minister’s allies, still fully supports Reeves. One of the colleagues said: “Rachel is the one who is forced to lift the difficult things.”

One of the well -related workers’ representatives said that Reeves opposed the decision last week to provide a privilege of 2.5 billion pounds for the rebels, fearing that this will simply lead to a return to further voting on Tuesday. “This was a Starmer decision,” the deputy said.

CaptiveA political operator revealing bruising joints of his battles with the hard left of the Labor Party, although the Prime Minister on Tuesday told his government that the briefing against him had to stop.

Ultimately, he is Starmer, whose first anniversary coincides with Downing Street on Friday, which carries the box.

His authority has stumbled, the Ming Vamia was shattered by party discipline, and more social welfare reforms have been undermined by this government.

Meanwhile, he left Reeves with capabilities 5 billion pounds sterling a financial hole The economists say it may compel them to do what cannot be defended politically in the fall: raising Britain’s taxes again.