Boards Aren’t Ready for the Age of AI: What Happens When Your CEO Is Exposed to a Deepfake?

Executives now face artificial threats from two directions: their images being cloned to allow fraudulent transfers or reputational damage, and AI-generated voices impersonating government officials, board members, and business partners used to manipulate them.

In 2019, an unnamed British energy executive received a phone call from someone he believed to be his CEO. The accent and subtle shifts in consonants were right, even the rhythm was familiar. Only after delivering $243,000 did they learn that the voice on the other end of the phone was synthetic. last year, Scammers clone the Italian Defense Minister He invited the country’s business elite. At least one sent nearly a million euros Before you learn the scam.

But these brands were lucky. Consider the impact if a synthetic video of your CEO making inappropriate remarks, announcing a false merger, or criticizing a regulator went viral on social media before your team could respond. Deepfakes are no longer a cybersecurity curiosity. They now represent a security threat, financial risk, and significant reputational risk.

The communications gap is wider than the security gap

Most coverage of deepfake threats focuses on detection algorithms and verification protocols. Cybersecurity vendors are providing solutions, and IT departments are updating policies. However, few address a question so important to CMOs and CEOs: What happens to your brand if your CEO’s image is used in fraud, misinformation, or personal attacks?

I have spent two decades advising executives through reputational crises, including regulatory investigations and hostile media campaigns. There are rules of the game in place in these situations. However, there is no established protocol for incidents such as the artificial likeness of a CEO authorizing a fraudulent takeover or a fabricated video of a founder going viral.

The executive vision now cuts both ways

Every social media post, headline, podcast appearance, and earnings call featuring a CEO provides potential training data to attackers. The vision that builds executive branding and humanizes leadership also provides the voice sampling and facial mapping needed for synthetic media.

Not every attack succeeds. Last year, scammers targeted the CEO of a global advertising company. They created a fake WhatsApp account using his photo, and it was organised Microsoft Teams communicate with a cloned AI voice they have been trained on YouTube shots, and a senior executive was asked to finance a new business venture. The employee refused and the company lost nothing, but the complexity of the attempt revealed how advanced the technology was.

The number of deepfakes has increased from 500,000 in 2023 to more Eight million in 2025. Audio reproduction fraud has risen 680 percent In one year. The expected losses from AI-powered fraud are expected to reach $40 billion by 2027. but, Only 32% of corporate executives believe their organizations are prepared to deal with a deepfake incident.

Three questions every communications team must answer now

First, do you have a detection protocol for synthetic media attacks? If an AI-generated replica of your CEO is used to defraud or mislead, who will communicate, when, and through what channels?

Second, have you done a deep bench workout? Crisis simulations must now include scenarios where the quasi-executive is used for internal fraud, external disinformation, or both.

Third, have you coordinated the response sequence with legal, cybersecurity, and investor relations? The deepfake crisis is a fraud event, a potential detection obligation, and a brand emergency, all at once. Silent responses will fail.

Act before attacking

The companies that will weather this era are building crisis protocols now, before their CEOs’ faces appear in videos they never recorded, say things they never said, and authorize transactions they never agreed to. Your CEO’s resemblance is a brand asset. It is also an attack vector.

Communications and brand teams that treat deepfakes like someone else’s problem — a cybersecurity issue, an IT issue, a finance fraud issue — will find themselves crafting apologies rather than strategies.

The opinions expressed in Fortune.com reviews are solely those of their authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions or beliefs luck.