Biden defends the use of controversy for collective compassion decisions in an NYT interview

Former President Joe Biden defended his use to create an autopsy during a recent interview with him, where he shed light on The logical basis for management for the controversial use of technology.

Interview with New York Times He was focusing on his use to create an autopsy during the last amnesty he made during the end of his administration.

In his last weeks in his post, Biden granted compassion and pardon more than 1500 individuals, while the White House described it At that time as the largest work to reach one day by an American president.

Speaking to the Times on Thursday, Biden said he “made every decision” alone.

“We are talking about (giving compassion) a large group of people.”

However, the Times stated that Biden “did not agree individually to every name of the factional pardon that applies to large numbers of people,” according to the former president and his assistants.

“Instead, after an intense discussion of different potential standards, (Biden) signed the criteria he wanted to use to determine the convicts who would qualify to reduce the sentence.”

Instead of repeating the president repeatedly asking for updated publications from official documents, his employees used Automated pilot to put Biden signature On the final version.

Biden’s comments came when the Republicans attacked him for use in dissecting the bodies on a large number of official documents.

In June, President Donald Trump sent a memo to the Ministry of Justice, which was directed by Prosecutor Bam Bondi to Investigate the use of the automated pilot And to determine whether it is associated with a decrease in the mental state of Biden.

“In recent months, it has become increasingly clear that former President Biden’s assistants have abused the presidential signature force by using the autopsy to hide Biden’s cognitive retreat and confirm the authority of Article Two,” Trump wrote.

“This conspiracy represents one of the most dangerous scandals in American history. The American public has been intentionally protected from the discovery of those practicing the executive authority, all while Biden’s signature was published across thousands of documents to bring about the transformations of radical policy.”

Also in June, Trump told correspondents that he believed it was “inappropriate” for the use of corpses at all, although former presidents had used them.

“Usually, when they put documents in front of you, it is important,” Trump said. “Even if you are registering ambassadors or – and I consider it important, I think it’s inappropriate.”

“You have a person who devotes four years of his life or more to being an ambassador. I think you really deserve this person to get a real signature … and not a signature on the autopsy.”

Breanne Deppisch from Fox News Digital contributed to this report.